Search This Blog

Showing posts with label poverty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label poverty. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 16, 2018

Predictors of Poverty in America


            Contrary to what is probably the speculation of the majority, the best poverty predictor in the United States is not race but family status. According to the data of the Census Bureau, in the United States the different levels of poverty are best predicted by the family makeup (Jeffrey, 2005). In other words, generally a relatively poor person belongs to a broken family and a child growing up in financial difficulty is the one who is raised by one parent and without the financial support of the other parent.
            According to the 2004 Census Bureau, only 6.4% of those living below poverty line belong to the married couple families. There is not much difference between black and whites. The rest belongs to those who live in broken families. 13.8% are those who belong to a family where the father is present but the mother is absent; while 30.5% are those without the father present.
            Based on these data, the second greatest predictor of poverty is the absence of the father or without the support of the father. As in most cases, the poorest children are those belonging to families wherein the father has left for good or is not an active participant in the family.
            The third greatest indicator of poverty in the United States is hours of work the parents or parent has. Whether the economy is good or bad, generally, those belonging to poor families are the ones which only have 800 hours of work for a year. This translates to only 16 hours of work in a week (Rector & Johnson, 2004). If the parent or parents do not work much, the family is more likely to belong in the poor bracket.
            Now if the family will have 2,000 hours of work in a given year, which is equivalent to one adult working for 40 hours in a week for the whole year, then they will be lifted to the above poverty line bracket (Rector & Johnson, 2004).
            Based on these three greatest predictors of poverty, the way to solve the country’s poverty problem is to strengthen the foundations of the family. By strengthening the foundations of the family, the number of broken families and the father leaving the household without giving any support will be reduced.
At the same time it is important to provide jobs for the families or adults in the household. Though welfare has its own merits, it is not enough for the government to simply provide such support. It is important that those living in poverty line be given jobs to support the needs of the family. 









Works Cited
Jeffrey, Terence P. 2005. “Best Poverty Predictor: Family Status, Not Race”. Human Events.
FindArticles.com. Retrieved 09 Feb. 2008 from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_200509/ai_n15643759
Rector, Robert E. and Johnson, Kirk A, PhD. 2004. “Understanding Poverty in America”. The
Heritage Foundation. Retrieved 09 Feb. 2008 from
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/bg1713.cfm


Monday, October 15, 2018

Gangs & Poverty


            Gangs have always been part of society. For as far back as Huckleberry Finn’s gang, society have ambivalently tolerated and accepted gangs as part of the society. Social scientists have debated as to the exact definition of gangs and so it has come to practice to identify gangs by their characteristics and not by exact definition. Stereotypically gangs tend to be exclusively racial and ethnical; and around 90% of gang members are male (Burnett & Walz. 1995). Gang activities differ from gang to gang and most of their activities are confined to their own locality. However there have been some great changes in gang activities and confinement over the recent years. For instance the Blood and Crips of Los Angeles now have members from across the country. 
            The changes in gangs in the last couple of years have created great impact on schools despite the fact that only few number of young people, less than 10% in fact, join gangs and that less than 2% of juvenile crimes are gang related (Burnett & Walz, 1995). The impacts of gangs are nevertheless quite tremendous. Primarily, the widespread violence in schools and the risk of suffering from violence in school are attributed to gang presence in such schools.
            Gang activities have also evolved into a more complex and organized ones. Today serious crimes, from drug trafficking to weapons trafficking, have become part of gang activities. These they bring into the schools and into the community. California Attorney General Bill Lockyer wrote, in his community response article on gangs that according to the Los Angeles Police Department, last year, an 11% increase killings are principally attributed to street and school gang violence (Lockyer, Bill, 2007). The Bureau of Justice Statistics reported that schools with gangs are more likely to have drugs available on school than those without the presence of gangs (Burnett & Walz, 1995). Gang members have also made the schools as their “turf” and not as an institution of learning.
            Poverty is another factor in gang membership and propagation. A youth living in poverty may have a feeling of hopelessness stemming from the inability to meet basic physical and social needs. This may then result into lack of self worth; which in turn the gang may offer. Moreover gangs doing illegal activities, such as drug trafficking can also provide cash for the needy youth and his family (Lees, Mary H., Dean, Mary & Parker, Louise, n.d).
            In formulating a gang control model it is vital to take these important facts into considerations. It is quite obvious that gangs have great impact on the schools and the society. It is also quite evident that one of its root causes, especially those gangs involved in illegal activities, is poverty. Generally gang evolution can then be traced as: born from poverty, propagates in the schools and spills over the community; or in some cases propagates in the community and spills over in the schools. Nevertheless, these are the basic things to consider in creating an effective model for gang control.
            Since poverty is the root cause of the problem, it is important to consider that children growing up in impoverished communities see that the way to attain wealth is by doing illegal activities. This is quite logical since their parents and neighbors often worked on dead end, unrewarding jobs and those who prosper are those involved in illegal activities. At a very young age, these children see gangs as a profitable career alternative. Creating effective social program is an option that is vital for this control model.
            Since school is the breeding ground or where gang spills over, the school must create a strategy that can address the socio-psychological reasons why children join gangs. Education plays an important part in gang membership. Educational programs that can uplift low self esteem in children must be created. These may be in the form of sports activities, school organized community project or school sponsored volunteer works. Programs must also specifically target vulnerable students, not just the gang members. School staff must be well informed and active in the programs. Parent involvement must be encouraged. If possible the school must go find jobs, by soliciting support from local organizations and businesses, for the students in financial difficulties.
As for gangs in the community, suppression plays an important part. According to the Federal Bureau of Prisons report, gang membership increases one’s likelihood of ending up in prison (Gangs, 2007).       The local community must create programs for suppressing gang activities. This may include soliciting more support from local police authorities or conducting community patrol. This may also include educating members of the community on recognizing gang activities and encouraging everyone to report on seeing such activities.
In creating a gang control model for state and local jurisdiction certain action areas must be addressed (Gang Suppression, 1994). First is assessing the problem. The presence of gangs in the schools and the community must be established. Formulation of what are considered as gang problems must be defined. “Sitting tight” or simply denying or ignoring the presence and threat of gangs in the school would create more problems for the school and the students. The gangs of today thrive on anonymity since this enables them to operate in illegal activities, such as selling of drugs in the school premise (Denial versus, n.d). The initial response of most schools, in trying to preserve their images, is denial. However the longer the school denies the problem the more ingrained the problem becomes. However it is also important to understand not to overstate the problem because this will only give the gangs more credit which elevates their status and notoriety in the school. Second is the organization and policy development. Here the community must organize itself to fight gang problem. The community must create committees that will establish law enforcement, employment, rehabilitation strategies. Local policies must be created and implemented. Here the state can address the issue of poverty. State legislation may create job opportunities for the youth and more career advancement opportunities for poor families. Third is the creation of relevant programs. Specific programs such as targeting, arresting and incarcerating of gang leaders and repeated offenders (Gang Suppression, 1994). Here specific school designed programs can then be established. School programs may involve local enforcements for suppressing crimes or local organizations which can give these children rewarding part time after school jobs. Fourth is community involvement. The community must be mobilized in such a way that schools, parent, criminal justice agencies, local organizations get involved in policy and program implementation. This is the actual implementation of all the relevant programs. Fifth is proper staffing. The committee should have enough staff which will work on all the aspects of gang problems. Staff should be well trained in identifying gang activities and in doing proper intervention. Last is funding. The community mobilization program must have the proper funding in order for it to work.
In conclusion, to be able to formulate effective suppression model it is important to focus on not just one option of program. Gang community problem and should be approached with both social and educational programs. At the same time current violent activities should be addressed with effective suppression programs.


Works Cited
Retrieved 10 August 2007 from
http://www.usc.edu/student-affairs/dt/V144/N01/04-poverty.01v.html
Burnett, Gary - Walz, Garry. 1995. Gangs in The School. ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban
Education New York NY.| Retrieved 10 August 2007 from
http://www.ericdigests.org/1995-1/gangs.htm
Denial Versus Acknowledging Gangs, n.d.
Retrieved 10 August 2007 from
Gangs. 2007. National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Department of Justice
Retrieved 10 August 2007 from
http://www.ncjrs.gov/spotlight/gangs/Summary.html
Gang Suppression and Intervention: Community Models. 1994. Office of Juvenile Justice
and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved 10 August 2007 from
Lees, Mary H., Dean, Mary & Parker, Louise. n.d. Why Do Young People Join Gangs? Focus
AS. Retrieved 10 August 2007 from
Lockyer, Bill. 2007. Gangs A Community Response. California Attorney General’s Crime and
Prevention Center. Retrieved 10 August 2007 from